Kina_Kina
Replies to this thread:

More by Kina_Kina
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Important for us: Hillary Clinton is proposing an amendment!

[Please view other pages to see the rest of the postings. Total posts: 25]
PAGE: <<  1 2  
[VIEWED 8240 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
The postings in this thread span 2 pages, View Last 20 replies.
Posted on 05-29-07 5:37 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Hey Guys/Gals,

Hillary Clinton (D-NY) is proposing an amendment to the "Boarder Security and Immigration Reform act of 2007” that will help foreigners to bring their family members to USA. Let's try to support her! Here is how you do it:

Go to this site to get the list of senators. It also has addresses and links to send email messages to any senator you want. You don't have to restrict yourself; you can send messages or your openion to any number of senators.

http://senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Then, change the following letter by just inserting the name of the senator that you are sending your openion to:


The Honorable Senator ….(name of the senator)…..
… insert the address of the senator (it is available at above site)

Dear Mr. ….(last name of the senator)…,

Subject: excessive (over five year) delays for permanent residents to be united with their foreign spouse/children.

I am writing to you as a friend of a family who is undergoing hardship as a result of numerical limitations on the spouse/children of permanent resident immigrant visa. They have been separated for several years now. It takes in excess of five years to get this visa. Beneficiaries are not allowed to visit the petitioner while they wait.

I urge you to support the proposed amendment to the "Boarder Security and Immigration Reform act of 2007” by Hillary Clinton (D-NY) to end family separation. It is often said that family unity is the cornerstone of the American immigration system. Let us not deny this to our future citizens and their families. Let them not have to decide between country and family.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
…..(your name)…..

Then, submit!

That is all you have to do. Your voice will count. Common guys lets send messages to as many senators as you can. It don't take more than a minute or two and you can be proud of yourself if the amendment get passed. It has pretty good chances to be passed because the amendment is proposed by no other than a presidential candidate.
 
Posted on 05-30-07 1:10 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Bathroomcoffee, We all know how the political game works, but this time situation is different and the bill is getting lots of momentum. Top ranked republicans and even president Bush is supporting the bill. On top of that Senator and House both are under Democratic control after 13 years. The probability of those kind of bill being passed is higher than ever, don't you agree?

On top, we have nothing to lose by telling what we like or dislike, what we support and not support. "Aaye Aap Gaye Jhataro" And always and always, acting on what you believe is better than doing nothing.

Anyone does not agree?
 
Posted on 05-30-07 3:09 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Bill getting a momentum is a long long ways from getting passed. That what they said in the last election year and the midterm election we just had last yr. And both the times the right wing reds knocked them down both times. Yeah senate and house is under democrats but they are TOOTHLESS. They could not even stop the president from vetoing the war funding bill just last week. They had to compromise and hand him the war funds needed. I WILL BELIEVE IT WHEN I SEE IT. Till then ...NO MUSTARD.
 
Posted on 05-31-07 9:02 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Because the Bush wanted set his legacy and this is only option that can be done in his term, his perspective to the bill is different now than in the past.
 
Posted on 06-01-07 1:04 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 
Posted on 06-07-07 2:05 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Immigration bill fails key test-vote By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer
13 minutes ago



A fragile bipartisan compromise that would legalize millions of unlawful immigrants suffered a setback Thursday when it failed a test vote in the Senate, leaving its prospects uncertain.

Still, the measure — a top priority for President Bush that's under attack from the right and left — won a brief reprieve when Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record), D-Nev., said he would give it more time before yanking the bill and moving on to other matters.

His decision set the stage for yet another procedural vote later Thursday that will measure lawmakers' appetite for a so-called "grand bargain" between liberals and conservatives on immigration.

If that fails, Reid threatened, "The bill's over with."

In the meantime, though, Reid said the president must lean on Republicans to back a deal that Bush spearheaded and most Democrats are eager to support.

"We are trying to get the bill passed. All we ask is that the White House weigh in and try to get some Republicans to vote with us," Reid said.

The bill would tighten borders, institute a new system to prevent employers from hiring undocumented workers, and give many of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants a pathway to legal status. Conceived by an improbable coalition, it exposes deep rifts within both parties.

By a vote of 33-63, the Senate fell far short of the 60 votes that would have been needed to limit debate on the immigration measure and put it on a path to passage. Republicans — even those who helped craft the measure and are ultimately expected to support it — banded together to oppose that move, while a majority of Democrats backed it. Fifteen Democrats and Independent Sen. Bernard Sanders (news, bio, voting record) of Vermont, who is usually allied with their party, voted "no."

Republicans were seeking assurances they would get chances to add several conservative-backed changes that would toughen the measure.

Democrats are "simply not going to get anywhere trying to stuff the minority," said Sen. Mitch McConnell (news, bio, voting record) of Kentucky, the GOP leader.

Republicans who cut the immigration deal and are working to fight off challenges to it from within their own ranks, nonetheless voted in solidarity with the rest of their party.

"Clearly, we need more time," said Sen. Jon Kyl (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., a framer of the agreement.

But even some Republicans said they were getting impatient with members of their own party who were balking at finishing the bill.

"I'm telling them, too, I've about had it. Enough is enough here now. We're going to get some more amendments," said Sen. Trent Lott (news, bio, voting record), R-Miss. "We're going to do this damn thing."

Proponents in both parties were scrambling to find a way of reversing a blow their compromise sustained earlier Thursday, when the Senate voted to phase out the bill's temporary worker program after five years.

The 49-48 vote just after midnight on making the temporary worker program itself temporary came two weeks after the Senate, also by a one-vote margin, rejected an earlier attempt by Sen. Byron Dorgan (news, bio, voting record) to end the program after five years. The North Dakota Democrat says immigrants take many jobs Americans could fill.

Dorgan's success dismayed backers of the immigration bill, which is loathed by many conservatives.

The Bush administration, along with business interests and their congressional allies, were already angry that the temporary worker program had been cut in half from its original 400,000-person-a-year target.

A five-year sunset, they said, could knock the legs from the precarious bipartisan coalition. The change "is a tremendous problem, but it's correctable," said Sen. Arlen Specter (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa. Backers will try as early as Thursday to persuade at least one senator to help reverse the outcome yet again, he added.

Until the Dorgan vote was tallied, Specter and other architects of the compromise had succeeded in maneuvering through a minefield of major challenges.

They had turned back a bid to reduce the number of illegal immigrants who could gain lawful status. They also defeated an effort to allow more family members of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents to qualify for green cards.

Still, several problematic changes proposed by conservatives prevailed, including one by Sen. John Cornyn (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas, that would make it easier to locate and deport illegal immigrants whose visa applications are rejected.

The bill would have barred law enforcement agencies from seeing applications for so-called Z visas that allow illegal immigrants to gain legal status.

Specter said Thursday that the issue would be revisited, given concerns that eligible applicants might be dissuaded from coming forward if they believed they could be deported as a result.

Also Thursday, the Senate rejected a conservative-backed amendment that would have allowed Congress to block the legalization of millions of unlawful immigrants if it deemed the border too porous.

The vote was 42-54 on an amendment by conservative Sens. Tom Coburn (news, bio, voting record), R-Okla., and Jim DeMint (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., that would have required a congressional vote to certify that border security and workplace enforcement "triggers" were in place before the legalization or the new guest worker program could take effect.

___

The bill is S1348

(This version CORRECTS description of Dorgan amendment to ending program after five years, not eliminating it. )

KINA KINA WHAT DID I TELL YOU ? he he
 



PAGE: <<  1 2  
Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 200 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
What are your first memories of when Nepal Television Began?
निगुरो थाहा छ ??
ChatSansar.com Naya Nepal Chat
Basnet or Basnyat ??
Sajha has turned into MAGATs nest
NRN card pros and cons?
TPS EAD auto extended to June 2025 or just TPS?
Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you
मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र!
Will MAGA really start shooting people?
Democrats are so sure Trump will win
Top 10 Anti-vaxxers Who Got Owned by COVID
TPS Work Permit/How long your took?
काेराेना सङ्क्रमणबाट बच्न Immunity बढाउन के के खाने ?How to increase immunity against COVID - 19?
Breathe in. Breathe out.
3 most corrupt politicians in the world
Dementia Joe has been selected to become the next President
आज बाट तिहारको सेल सकियो
Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters